Legal Opinion

Jarrett v. Dayton Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1985No. 85-567PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The trial court’s entry of judgment against Mucci was not a final order. When an order “adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties [it] shall not terminate the action * * * and the order * * * is subject to revision at any time before *78the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.” Civ. R. 54(B). An entry of judgment involving fewer than all of the claims or parties is not final unless the court expressly determines that there is “no just reason for delay.” Id.

Because the judgment…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. A & D Limited Partnership v. KeefeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gilson v. Am. Inst. of Alternative MedicineOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Renner's Welding & Fabrication, Inc. v. Chrysler Motor Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Love Properties, Inc v. Kyles, 2006 Ca 00101 (4-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API