Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. Cochran
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The court of appeals found that the Cochrans’ counterclaim asserted a claim which avoided the Statute of Frauds and, in fact, stated a cause of action for fraud in the inducement which would have released the Cochrans from their obligations on the notes and the mortgage. We find this holding untenable in light of the record of the transactions and the content of the documents now before us. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth hereinafter, we now reverse in part and affirm in part.
I
At the outset, we hold that it was error to allow the foreclosure and subsequent sale of the mortgaged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Colley v. BazellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Miller v. LintOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Lessee of Hannel v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1846
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Ed Schory & Sons, Inc. v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, IncorporatedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Davis v. Immediate Medical Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Lindenschmidt v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1995
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.