Legal Opinion
Mai v. American Seafoods Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 14, 2011No. 63969-2-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 American Seafoods Co. LLC and Northern Hawk LLC (collectively ASC) appeal a judgment *533for maintenance, compensatory damages, and attorney fees awarded because they failed to pay maintenance and cure to Tuyen Thanh Mai. ASC contends it had no obligation to pay maintenance and cure during the period of time Mai refused to attend an independent medical examination (IME) as requested by ASC. ASC also asserts that insufficient evidence supports the trial court’s award of compensatory damages and attorney fees.
Leach, A.C.J.
*533f 2 We hold that under the facts of the case, ASC could not condition…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dean v. Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Carlos GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Dean v. Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Shoffner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Dean v. Fishing Co. of AlaskaWashington Supreme Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.