Legal Opinion

Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 7, 1953No. 13PublishedCited by 993 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The respondent Charles Hawn sustained severe physical injuries when he slipped and fell through an uncovered hatch hole on the petitioner Pope & Talbot’s vessel. The ship was then berthed at a pier located in Pennsylvania waters of the Delaware River. Loading of the vessel with grain for a voyage had been temporarily interrupted to make minor repairs on the grain loading equipment. Hawn was doing carpentry work on this equipment to make it spread the grain evenly and thereby balance the ship’s load to make the coming voyage safer. He was not an employee of Pope & Talbot’s but of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by993 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

988 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API