Dean v. Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 Ian Dean worked aboard a fishing vessel owned by The Fishing Company of Alaska (FCA). While aboard the vessel, Dean experienced pain in his hands and neck. After Dean left the vessel, he sought medical treatment and FCA began paying Dean maintenance and cure as required by general maritime law. After paying Dean’s maintenance and cure for just over three years, FCA stopped paying when it obtained the opinion of a physician that Dean’s injuries had reached maximum cure. At the time when FCA cut off Dean’s maintenance and cure, Dean’s own physician opined that Dean’s injuries could benefit…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Faciszewski v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Durant v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- Sabow v. American Seafoods Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.