Dean v. Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Leach, A.C.J.
¶1 In this case of first impression, we must decide whether the usual summary judgment standard applies to a seaman’s pretrial motion to reinstate maintenance and cure. Ian Dean appeals a trial court decision denying his pretrial motion. He contends that a more lenient standard should apply given the solicitude courts have traditionally afforded seamen seeking compensation for maritime injuries. While we are sensitive to this special solicitude, we hold the trial court correctly applied the summary judgment standard to deny Dean’s motion.
¶2 Dean also claims the trial court erred…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Fred I. Putnam and James A. Overman v. Harry C. Lower, John Kadlec, George S. Herning, Edgar L. Peecher, William E. Barquist and Norman L. BunkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- L.C. Johnson v. Marlin Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Mosher v. Tate the FearlessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dean v. Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Shoffner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Dean v. Fishing Co. of AlaskaWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- NEWLUN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015