Legal Opinion
Taylor v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 3, 1989No. 68409PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
Proceedings to review an order of the Worker’s Compensation Court three-judge panel denying recovery under a motion to reopen a claim for change of condition as not timely filed. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded with instructions. We VACATE the opinion of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the Order of the Worker’s Compensation Court Review Panel.
The parties will be referred to as Claimant (Taylor), and Respondent (City of Oklahoma City, own risk). Claimant suffered injuries during the course of his employment in late 1981. By order dated November 30, 1982, claimant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Shank v. Oklahoma Office & Bank Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Hadley v. American General Life Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Worley v. Wyoming Bottling Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Assessment of Personal Property Taxes Against Missouri Gas EnergySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Ellington v. Horwitz EnterprisesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Hanes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Herman Bros. v. HuffmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.