Legal Opinion
Munsingwear, Inc. v. Tullis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1976No. 48686PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
The sole review issue is statute of limitations in the “Workmen’s Compensation Law.” 85 O.S.1971, § 43. Sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the amount of disability is not involved. This is not an “occupational disease” case under § 3(16).
Maxine C. Tullis (a respondent and the claimant below) filed her claim for compensation on January 13, 1975. By amendments prior to hearing, claim was based on industrial accident by inhalation of deleterious substances, with a principal defense of Munsingwear, Inc. (a petitioner and respondent below) and The Travelers Insurance Company…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. NolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Steffens Ice Cream Co. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge 1785 v. CavanessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Dorothy Williams v. Borden, Inc., and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.