Hanes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANE, J.
¶ 1 This case presents an issue of first impression: may the State of Oklahoma enforce its fishing regulations against a Cherokee Indian fishing at the water’s edge on the *332west bank of the Neosho or Grand River1 at the city park in Miami, Oklahoma? To answer this question, we address two issues on appeal: 1) whether the riverbed of the Neo-sho or Grand River at the city park in Miami, Oklahoma is within Indian country, and 2) whether the State may enforce its protective fishing regulations against a Cherokee Indian fishing outside Indian country. We hold the site in question is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- STATE v. LAWHORNCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.