Legal Opinion

Hanes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 22, 1999No. M-97-1401PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANE, J.

¶ 1 This case presents an issue of first impression: may the State of Oklahoma enforce its fishing regulations against a Cherokee Indian fishing at the water’s edge on the *332west bank of the Neosho or Grand River1 at the city park in Miami, Oklahoma? To answer this question, we address two issues on appeal: 1) whether the riverbed of the Neo-sho or Grand River at the city park in Miami, Oklahoma is within Indian country, and 2) whether the State may enforce its protective fishing regulations against a Cherokee Indian fishing outside Indian country. We hold the site in question is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. STATE v. LAWHORNCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API