Legal Opinion
Herman Bros. v. Huffman
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 17, 2001No. 95,155PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REIF, Vice Chief Judge:
T1 Employer and Insurance Carrier seek review of the trial court's "order authorizing medical treatment" for a change of condition for the worse in Claimant's lumbar spine. They contend that the trial court erred in entering this order, because (1) Claimant did not timely file his motion to reopen for change of condition and (2) the medical evidence fails to show any change in Claimant's condition that existed at the time of the initial disability award. We address only the first assignment of error, because it is dis-positive.
*31712 To support their first assignment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Neer v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Matter of Estate of SpeakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Pointer v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fleming v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Jackson v. Cyclo LP Gas, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- AMS STAFF LEASING INC. v. THOMPSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- AMS STAFF LEASING INC. v. THOMPSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015