Legal Opinion

Don S. Noble v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1981No. 79-7643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLE, Circuit Judge:

The Secretary of Labor issued a decision which held that in calculating layoff benefits under § 207(a) of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978 (Act), 16 U.S.C. § 79b, 1 appellant, Don S. Noble’s base period of eligibility would be that period during which he worked for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, his last employer. The Secretary reversed an earlier ruling by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that Noble’s benefits under § 207(a) could be computed by looking to the hours worked for his employer, or to the hours worked for a previous employer, Redwood…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rockbridge v. LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Darrell Barnes, and J.J. Schroeder v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Ashcom v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. In Re the Petition of Lloyd E. Ashcom v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, in Re the Petition of Merel E. Babcock v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. James W. Brooks v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Charles Rankin v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API