Legal Opinion

Rains v. Donovan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1983No. 82-7086PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners Rains, Waldon, and Langford are laid-off employees of Nor-Cal Cutters, a logging contractor formerly working for Simpson Timber Co. in forest lands near, but not inside, the area used to expand Redwood National Park in 1978. Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163 (“Redwood Act”)1 provides benefits to certain employees affected by the expansion of the Park. The petitioners appeal the decision of the Secretary of Labor that they do not qualify for Redwood Act benefits. We note jurisdiction under 16 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Ashcom v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Albert J. Hoehn v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Danny W. Tuey, and Leslie A. Dehaven v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Donald L. Scott, William G. Gillespie, Archie T. Lawrence v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Tuey v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re RainsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Willie J. Sorrels v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API