Legal Opinion
Shortridge v. Daubney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 22, 1988No. C1-86-1428, CX-86-1430PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
The determinative issue in this appeal is whether property owners’ delay of several years in taking legal action bars them from challenging a special assessment on the basis of a defective notice of hearing. By a split decision, the court of appeals agreed with the trial court, ruling that the defect in the notice rendered the special assessment void. Shortridge v. Daubney, 400 N.W.2d 841 (Minn.App.1987). We reverse.
During 1980 and 1981 the City of Maple-wood made substantial improvements along Maryland Avenue in Maplewood. In June of 1981 the city mailed a notice of hearing to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Klapmeier v. Town of Center of Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Geib v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Shortridge v. DaubneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rasse v. City of MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gadey v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Hay v. City of AndoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Countryside Village v. City of North BranchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.