Legal Opinion
Andrusick v. City of Apple Valley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 16, 1977No. 47319PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The respondent city, acting pursuant to Minn.St. c. 429, initiated a local street improvement and levied an assessment against appellants’ property. The property owners appealed from this assessment to the Dakota County District Court. The appeal was taken basically upon the grounds that the improvement did not benefit the property. The notice of appeal required by Minn.St. 429.081 was served on the city clerk on Monday, October 13, 1975, which was designated by § 645.44, subd. 5, as a holiday (Columbus Day). That statute provided also “ * * * nor shall any civil process be served thereon.”
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Minnesota v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
- Lebens v. HarbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- City of Owatonna v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- In Re Estate of DahmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights, A14-1992Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Greer v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Sykes v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.