Union Labor Hosp. Ass'n v. Vance Redwood Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Denver Sevier, C. M. Wheeler, F1. A. Cutler, and F. B>. Sweasey, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
This action was brought by plaintiff against the named defendant and six other lumber companies, to obtain an injunction restraining and enjoining them from conspiring and combining together to vex, annoy, hinder, injure, and destroy the hospital business of plaintiff. The scheme of annoyance and destruction consisted in this: The defendants compelled every employee to consent to the deduction of one dollar from his monthly wage, twelve and one-half cents of which went into a contingent fund to help needy employees who might be injured and eighty-seven and a half cents of which went to a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909
- Boyson v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Payne v. Western & Atlantic RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1884
- Heywood v. TillsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Marin v. JacuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.