Legal Opinion

Decker v. Dyson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 19, 2006No. 04-4200UnpublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge

Appellants Barbara Decker and June Quine, plaintiffs in this diversity case filed in the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, seek review of the District Court’s dismissal of their complaint under Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, Varnie R. Dyson. We must decide whether the District Court erred: (1) in dismissing Decker and Quine’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over Dyson; and (2) in dismissing their complaint without ordering transfer, in the words of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Toys "R" Us, Inc. Geoffrey, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A. Imaginarium Net, S.LCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Farber v. Tennant Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Skidmore v. Led ZeppelinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Kallman v. AronchickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Kee v. Blue Line Distributing, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
  5. ADAMS, NASH & HASKELL, INC. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API