Legal Opinion
ADAMS, NASH & HASKELL, INC. v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 19, 2020No. 2:19-cv-03529Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ADAMS, NASH & HASKELL, INC., Civil Action No.: 2:19-cv-03529 Plaintiff, v. OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. CECCHI, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant the United States of America (“Defendant”) (ECF No. 7), to dismiss Plaintiff Adams, Nash & Haskell, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or “ANH”) Amended Complaint (ECF No. 5, “Am. Compl.”). Defendant moves to dismiss this action for improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), or alternatively, to transfer venue to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lafferty v. St. RielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.