Legal Opinion
Toys "R" Us, Inc. Geoffrey, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A. Imaginarium Net, S.L
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 27, 2003No. 18-2573PublishedCited by 634 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Toys “R” Us, Inc. and Geoffrey, Inc. (“Toys”) brought this action against Step Two, S.A. and Imaginarium Net, S.L. (“Step Two”), alleging that Step Two used its Internet web sites to engage in trademark infringement, unfair competition, misuse of the trademark notice symbol, and unlawful “cybersquatting,” in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1501 et seq., and New Jersey state law. The District Court denied Toys’ request for jurisdictional discovery and, simultaneously, granted Step Two’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by634 opinions
- Best Van Lines, Inc. v. Tim Walker, Docket No. 04-3924-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Marten v. GodwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Metcalfe v. Renaissance Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Joseph MosseriCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
629 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.