Legal Opinion

Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-3089PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Skidmore, as trustee for the Randy Craig Wolfe Trust, brings claims for direct, contributory, and vicarious copyright infringement against the living members of the band Led Zeppelin (James Patrick “Jimmy” Page, Robert Plant, and John Paul Jones) and various music industry companies associated with Led Zeppelin. The corporate Defendants are (1) Super Hype Publishing, Inc., a *584publishing company owned and managed by Page that publishes the musical compositions of Led Zeppelin and Page; (2) Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., a global music…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Michael Skidmore v. Led ZeppelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Law School Admission Council, Inc. v. TatroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Michael Skidmore v. Led ZeppelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. DANDY v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEATLH AND UROLOGYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Dermansky v. The Young Turks, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API