Legal Opinion
Hilliard v. Clifford
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1925No. 19109. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On April 20, 1922, the Great Northern Railway Company entered into a contract with Grant Smith & Company by which the latter company agreed to “improve the terminal yards” of the former, company, located at Skykomish, in this state. By the terms of the contract, the work was to he performed according to plans and specifications furnished by the ■railway company, and for its performance the contracting company agreed to furnish all labor, tools, apparatus, material and equipment.
Without the plans and specifications, which from their complicated nature cannot he reproduced here, it is difficult…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seeberger v. Burlington Northern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Seeberger v. Burlington Northern R. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Reynolds v. Addison Miller Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Schosboek v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Bennor v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933