Legal Opinion
Schosboek v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1936No. 26073. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by respondent on October 8, 1931, while he was a section foreman in the employ of appellant railroad company and assisting, under the direction of appellant Hall, supervising agent and vice-principal of the company, in extinguishing a fire on the railroad right of way and premises of the company at Hyak, in this state. The action was tried to the court and a jury. The complaint in the action was filed April 30,1934.
Following the overruling of a demurrer to the eom plaint, appellants answered, alleging affirmatively that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. BolleSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Raymond v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lessee v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Schosboek v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Seeberger v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998