Seeberger v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.
— We must decide in this case if an injured railroad worker has adduced sufficient evidence of his employer’s negligence to take his case under 45 U.S.C. § 51, the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), to the jury. Under the very liberal test articulated in federal case law, which requires the worker provide only slight evidence his injuries were foreseeably the result of the railroad’s breach of its duty to provide him a safe tool in his workplace, we hold the worker produced sufficient evidence to take his FELA case to a jury. Consequently, we reverse the trial court’s summary judgment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Seeberger v. Burlington Northern R. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Keranen v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Estate of Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.