Legal Opinion

Bennor v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1933No. 24726. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, J.—

A group of defendant’s employees, designated “repair gang,” on a work train, moved from place to place wherever needed to perform certain work (putting in rails, ties and gravel and raising the tracks) along the line of defendant’s interstate railroad. Joseph Bennor was employed as an assistant cook—he termed himself “bull cook”—in that repair gang. He testified as follows concerning the duties required of him:

“They call it bull cook,—taking the stuff into the cars, you see, the canned supplies, handling those for the cook, and it is up to the cook to do the work. I was bull cook…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Hilliard v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schosboek v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. DeLong v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API