Legal Opinion
Bemesderfer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided December 18, 2023No. 6:22-cv-00270Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION DUSTIN BEMESDERFER, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:22-cv-270-PGB-EJK UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on the Defendant UPS’s (“Defendant” or “UPS”) Motion to Exclude Plaintiff Dustin Bemesderfer’s (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Bemesderfer”) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”) Exemption and Training Expert, Mr. Don Olds (“Mr. Olds”). (Doc. 127 (the “Daubert Motion”)). The Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition.1 (Doc. 176). Applying the analysis outlined in Daubert and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.