United States v. Richard Junior Frazier
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Richard Junior Frazier appeals his conviction for kidnapping. He claims that the district court abused its discretion by excluding certain expert testimony of a forensic investigator, while allowing the government to present expert evidence on the same issue. After thorough review of the record, we conclude that the district court’s evidentiary rulings were neither an abuse of discretion, nor “manifestly erroneous.” Gen. Elec. Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 142, 118 S.Ct. 512, 517, 139 L.Ed.2d 508 (1997) (citation omitted). More generally, we reaffirm the basic principle…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,033 opinions
- United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. ComCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
1,028 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.