Legal Opinion
Quiet Technology DC-8, Inc., Quiet Technology, Inc. v. Hurel-Dubois UK LTD.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 11, 2003No. 02-14370PublishedCited by 384 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Although this case arises in a technologically sophisticated context, the evidentiary issues it presents are straightforward. At its core, this appeal requires us to determine whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting, and subsequently rejecting a post-trial challenge to, the testimony of Joel Frank (“Frank”), an expert in computational fluid dynamics (“CFD”) for appellee Hurel Dubois UK, Ltd. (“Hu-rel”). We also must evaluate the propriety of the district court’s refusal to appoint an independent expert to assess the reliability of Frank’s proffered…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by384 opinions
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Rink v. Cheminova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- In Re Zurn Pex Plumbing Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
379 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.