Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Durallium Products Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1950No. Appeal, No. 213PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

Plaintiffs appeal from the order of the court below granting a new trial in an assumpsit suit. The rule of law which governs the granting of a new trial is succinctly stated by Mr. Justice Drew in Tupponce v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 358 Pa. 589, 590, 57 A. 2d 898:“ ‘ “We will not reverse an order awarding a new trial unless a palpable abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge is disclosed or unless an erroneous rule of law, which in the circumstances necessarily controls the outcome of the case, is certified by the trial judge as the sole…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Macan v. Scandinavia Belting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Marko v. MendelowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Se-Ling Hosiery, Inc. v. MarguliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Helpin v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API