Harman Et Ux. v. Chambers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
The suit involved in this appeal was instituted by Ernest M. Harman and Florence G. Harman, his wife, partners doing business under the trade name, Rail & Industrial Equipment Co., against Philip Chambers, a dealer in mining equipment, ■ to recover (1) the price paid by the plaintiffs for three used hopper coal cars which, in alleged breach of contract, the defendant did not deliver, (2) the expenses incurred by plaintiffs in an effort to obtain delivery of the cars, (3) the profit they lost on the anticipated resale of the cars, and (4) tlie-cost of advertising…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hunter v. BremerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Purdy v. MasseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Susser v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Wilkinson v. North East BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Stoner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. AlmeidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Enfield v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.