Legal Opinion

Se-Ling Hosiery, Inc. v. Margulies

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1950No. Appeal, 181PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order awarding a new trial in an action of assumpsit.

On November 25, 1946, the plaintiff corporation engaged in the manufacture of hosiery in Nashville, Tennessee, sent to the defendant, in Philadelphia, a total of 1100 dozen pairs of nylon hosiery for the purpose of having them seamed, looped and examined. This quantity of hosiery was received. The defendant asserted that it did the required work and shipped the entire 1100 dozen pairs to the plaintiff by the same common carrier which had brought the stockings to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Arco Metalscraft Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. State v. PaulsgroveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Thompson v. DysonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Lynch v. FiggeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. McSparran v. HaniganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Vernon v. StashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Samuel J. Lansberry, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Lambert v. Durallium Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. In Re Estate of RoosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API