Legal Opinion

Allin v. Snavely

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1950No. Civ. 17522PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying recovery for damages resulting from an intersectional collision between an automobile driven by respondent and that operated by Bessie Allin, herein referred to as appellant. Attack is made on the finding that appellant was contributorily negligent and that her negligence proximately contributed to the accident.

The collision occurred at the intersection of Avenue 40 and K Street east of the town of Lancaster. Both highways were 60 feet in width. Appellant was proceeding south on Avenue 40 while respondent was going west on K Street. The two cars…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Poncino v. Reid-Murdock & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hodge v. BordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Graham v. MilsapIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Powell v. BartmessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API