Legal Opinion

Huerter v. Hassig

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1954No. 39,191PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This action was instituted by plaintiffs, landowners, whose farms are located in the vicinity of Lake Nemaha in Nemaha county, against members of the state forestry, fish and game commission, the headquarters of which is in Pratt county.

Plaintiffs sought a writ of mandamus to compel members of that commission and its director to remove an obstruction in the Nemaha river which the state constructed in the building of Lake Nemaha and which plaintiffs allege is damaging their lands.

The action was filed in the district court of Nemaha county and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Caster v. FlannellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Clay v. HoysradtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. City of Kansas City v. SessionsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Fay v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. State Board of Education v. District Court of Bryan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Office of Governor—Department of Industrial Development v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections v. BrockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Metropolitan Topeka Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API