Fay v. Edmiston
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jewell District Court. ' At the September Term, 1881/of the district court, plaintiff Edmiston recovered a judgment for $879.31 and costs against defendants Fay and two others, who bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
A. B. Smith was the sheriff of Jewell county, Kansas, and Patrick Fay, J. D. Robertson and .0. L. McClung were his sureties on his official bond. James Martin was the owner of two judgments rendered by the district court of Atchison county, Kansas, against one M. M. Herrington. Executions were issued on these judgments, directed to the sheriff of Jewell county, and were received by him and levied upon certain property belonging to Herrington, subject to certain attachments. The sheriff did not sell the property, but returned the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clay v. HoysradtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Fay v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Ritchie v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- State ex rel. Caster v. FlannellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- City of Topeka v. RitchieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Huerter v. HassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Fisher v. FranklinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.