Smith v. Miller
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, C. J.:
The single question in this appeal is the sufficiency of the service of summons to bring the defendant into court.
The action was to compel the defendant owner of a quarter section of land in Stafford county to remove a dam which interrupts and diverts the waters of Rattlesnake creek, which flows through his land and downstream therefrom through lands of plaintiffs, which are also situated in Stafford county.
Sometime in 1930 the defendant constructed a dam across Rattlesnake creek on his land, with the consequence that the natural flow of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers Bros. & Co. v. King Wrought-Iron Bridge ManufactorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Shamleffer v. Council Grove Peerless Mill Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Heston v. FinleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Robertson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WynkoopSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Foss v. WilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Colorado v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Huerter v. HassigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- State v. Kansas State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Howard v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942