Legal Opinion

Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1997No. 74,571PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Royse, J.:

Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) and Sun Life Insurance Company of America (Sun Life) brought this action against the Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority (MTAA) to recover damages for aircraft destroyed in a hangar fire at Forbes Field Airport. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, and MTAA appeals.

MTAA is a governmental entity created pursuant to K.S.A. 27-317 et seq. MTAA operates two airports, Philip Billard Airport and Forbes Field Airport. Located within the confines of the Forbes Field Airport is hangar 626, an aircraft hangar built in the 1940’s. On November…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Nero v. Kansas State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  3. Jackson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Fudge v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Georgia Forestry Commission v. CanadySupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Grice v. CVR Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Dunn v. Unified School District No. 367Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  4. City of Wichita v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Colombel v. MilanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API