Legal Opinion

Niggel v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1971No. Appeal, 271PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an appeal from the Order of the lower court granting a Judgment N.O.V. for defendant-appellee.

In 1968 appellant, a truck driver, was making deliveries to a Sears, Roebuck and Co. store. After the delivery the store manager asked him to take back a number of boxes which were to be returned. The boxes were bound by steel wire around each end of the box, and the wires were joined together by a connection twisted by a machine in the store. As the driver lifted a box, two ends of the wire pulled apart at the connection, one end whipping across his face and lacerating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Smail v. FlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Moyer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Florig v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Albert v. AlterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Viener v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API