Legal Opinion

Moyer v. Ford Motor Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1965No. Appeal, No. 117PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant, Earl R. Moyer, instituted a suit in assumpsit against appellee, Ford Motor Company, charging that appellee’s negligent assembly of appellant’s automobile constituted a breach of warranty, resulting in personal injuries and property damage to the appellant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellant in the sum of $2129.25. Appellee filed motions for a new trial and for judgment n.o.v. After argument before the court en banc, judgment n.o.v. was entered in favor of the appellee. This appeal followed.

It is well established that in granting a judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Smail v. FlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Ashcraft v. C. G. Hussey and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Rennekamp v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Albert v. AlterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API