Legal Opinion
Urban Elec. Co., Inc. v. Cable Index
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 5, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-0789-MAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAZZONE, District Judge.
This case comes before me on a motion for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The movant, Consolidated Rail Corp. (“Conrail”) seeks to extricate itself from a multiparty suit in which it is involved as a third party defendant. The non-movant, Phil Orzell Associates (“Orzell”) is both a defendant and a third party plaintiff.
The basic facts are not in dispute. The primary plaintiff in this action is Urban Electrical Company (“Urban”). At all relevant times, it was a subcontractor on a project sponsored by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. North American Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Intech, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Sokhos v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Mesta v. Allied Van Lines International, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Rini v. United Van Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Aida Dayton Technologies Corp. v. I.T.O. Corp. of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Universal Manufacturing Corp. v. Associated Rigging & Hauling Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Chafetz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.