Legal Opinion
Universal Manufacturing Corp. v. Associated Rigging & Hauling Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1991No. CV 91-1241PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
Universal Manufacturing Corp. and Greg Jenkins, d/b/a Advanced Leasing Corporation, (“plaintiffs”) bring this suit for damage caused to a driller-router machine (“the machine”) while in transit from Aquebogue, New York to Woodenville, Washington. Named as defendants are Associated Rigging and Hauling Corp. (“Associated”), United Van Lines, Inc. (“UVL”), and Killmorgen Corporation, d/b/a Additive Products (“Additive”). Presently before the Court is defendant UVL’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- White v. United Van Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Polaroid Corp. v. Hermann Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- B. F. Goodrich Tire Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aida Dayton Technologies Corp. v. I.T.O. Corp. of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Dipaolo MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Prestige Equipment Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998