Legal Opinion

RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1976No. 75-86PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrahamson, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the insured’s failure to give any notice of loss to the insurer for more than nine months after the insured’s property was damaged released the insurer from liability as a matter of law.

FACTS

Maryland Casualty Company issued to RTE Corporation an indemnity policy of property damage insurance which for purposes of this appeal both parties agree may be considered to be a cargo insurance policy. The policy contained the following provisions of interest on this appeal:

it “14. 'OTHER INSURANCE: Except as to specific insurance as defined in Section 13 of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. McPhee v. American Motorists InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Wisconsin Zinc Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. French v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Foster v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Fehring v. Republic InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API