Legal Opinion
In re Zinc Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 2016No. 14-cv-3728 (KBF)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*343OPINION & ORDER
KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are four motions to dismiss claims brought by purchasers of primary zinc under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. Plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that defendants, which consist of trading and metals warehouse operating affiliates of Glencore pic, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Goldman Sachs”), and JPMorgan Chase & Company (“JPMor-gan”), have engaged in a conspiracy to monopolize and otherwise restrain trade in the market of services for zinc stored in warehouses licensed by the London Metal Exchange (“LME”) in the…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Dennis v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Auraria Student Housing at the Regency, LLC v. Campus Village Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Credit Suisse Group AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.