Legal Opinion

In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided August 2, 2018No. 15 Civ. 7488 (CM)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMahon, C.J.:

Plaintiffs J.M. Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company ("Smith") and Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. ("RDC") (collectively, "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" or "Plaintiffs") commenced this antitrust suit on behalf of themselves and a putative class of similarly situated purchasers of Namenda. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants - Actavis PLC (now known as Allergan PLC), Forest Laboratories, LLC, Forest Laboratories, Inc., and Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. (collectively, "Forest" or "Defendants") - schemed to delay entry of generic versions of an Alzheimer's disease…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Alves v. Affiliated Care of Putnam, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. Browning v. Edmonson County, KentuckyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  3. CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
  4. Carefirst of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
  5. Clark v. The Travelers Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API