In re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
McMahon, C.J.:
Plaintiffs J.M. Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company ("Smith") and Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. ("RDC") (collectively, "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" or "Plaintiffs") commenced this antitrust suit on behalf of themselves and a putative class of similarly situated purchasers of Namenda. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants - Actavis PLC (now known as Allergan PLC), Forest Laboratories, LLC, Forest Laboratories, Inc., and Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. (collectively, "Forest" or "Defendants") - schemed to delay entry of generic versions of an Alzheimer's disease…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Alves v. Affiliated Care of Putnam, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Browning v. Edmonson County, KentuckyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Carefirst of Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Clark v. The Travelers Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.