Chrysler Corp. v. Todorovich
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
This appeal presents troublesome questions involving the duty of a manufacturer to anticipate collisions when designing and constructing automobiles, and the apportionment of damages and the application of the contribution statutes between an automobile manufacturer and the driver of a following automobile when an automobile seat breaks from the force of a rear end collision, causing an indivisible injury. These questions are unique in Wyoming, and the combination of the latter two apparently is rare in other jurisdictions. Other issues relating to the loss of elective office…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Barbara F. Evans, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Evans, Deceased v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- O'DONNELL v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Beard v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.