Legal Opinion
Di Carlo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 9, 1925No. 192, 199PublishedCited by 241 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, with others, were indicted under two indictments, one for obstructing justice and intimidating a witness (section 135 of the Criminal Code [Comp. St. § 10305]), and the other for conspiracy to intimidate and to injure a person who had testified as a witness (section 136 of the Criminal Code [Comp. St. § 10306]). Each indictment had two counts, and the two were consolidated and tried as one. Di Carlo was convicted on both indictments ; Ruffino was acquitted on the first indictment and convicted on the second. Each took out a separate writ. Since no question…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- People v. . KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Stanley v. GadsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by241 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.