Legal Opinion

Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 27, 1999No. AC 17634PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion,

HENNESSY, J.

The plaintiff, Interlude, Inc. (Interlude), appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its request for a refund for taxes paid on real property. Specifically, Interlude appeals from the denial of a refund for taxes paid by it that had accrued prior to its acquisition of the property but had not yet become due and payable until after Interlude had acquired the property.1 Interlude claims that the trial court improperly applied an exemption from taxation as allowed by General Statutes § 12-81b, as adopted by the Danbury Code § 18-20. We affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FrankoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. National CSS, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Wilson v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. City of Norwich v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API