Legal Opinion
Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 1, 2002No. AC 17634PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Previously, in Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat, 54 Conn. App. 284, 288-89, 734 A.2d 1045 (1999), rev’d, 253 Conn. 531, 754 A.2d 153 (2000), we concluded that action by the plaintiff, Interlude, Inc. (Interlude), seeking a refund for taxes it paid on real property was barred by the one year statute of limitations contained in General Statutes § 12-119.1 The Supreme Court granted certification; Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat, 250 Conn. 927, 738 A.2d 657 (1999); on the issue of whether we had properly applied § 12-119 to this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Snyder v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Low Stamford Corp. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. J.r.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002