Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 8, 1992No. 14539PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs’ declaratory judgment action challenging the manner in which their taxable real property had been assessed was barred by the one year statute of limitations provision of General Statutes § 12-119.1 The named plaintiffs brought a declaratory *112judgment class action on behalf of most of the taxpayers2 named on the October 1,1989 grand list of the town of Old Saybrook, against the defendants, Lucille B. Kelley and Olive P. Mulvihill, the town’s assessor and tax collector, respectively. The plaintiffs sought a declaration that the grand…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Donald A. Swan v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York by Gustave G. Rosenberg, Its Chairman, George A. Pierson, and Margaret v. KielyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Stafford Higgins Industries, Inc. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Carol Management Corp. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mannweiler v. LaFlammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. Man Industries (INDIA), Ltd, Prime Pipe International, Inc., and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.