Legal Opinion
Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 4, 2000No. SC 16185PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the one year statute of limitations provided by General Statutes § 12-1191 applies to a claim for *533reimbursement of property taxes paid by a charitable organization pursuant to General Statutes § 12-81b2 and Danbury Code § 18-20.3 The plaintiff, Interlude, Inc. (Interlude), appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which in turn affirmed the judgment of the trial court denying Interlude’s claim for a refund of taxes paid on certain real property owned by it. Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat, 54 Conn. App. 284, 285, 734 A.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National CSS, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Wilson v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. JimenezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Faith Center, Inc. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Loomis Institute v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wiele v. Board of Assessment AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Electric Cable Compounds, Inc. v. Town of SeymourConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.