Legal Opinion

Will of Hurley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, J.(1) The case presents the very unusual situation where an executor retained possession of real estate belonging to the testatrix without attempting to make a final settlement of the estate for more than twelve years. Sec. 313.14 of the Statutes declares the public policy of the state that the time within which an estate should be settled shall be limited. But after the expiration of the time fixed by statute, it is still the duty of the executor *23to care for the property of the deceased and to conserve the estate until it is finally settled. Lindemann v. Rusk, 125 Wis. 210, 225, 104…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindemann v. RuskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Warner Bros. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Long v. LandmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re Fox's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Russell v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Will of Leonard v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re Alexander's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. In Re Kelley's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Dowell v. McElhineySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Foot v. KelleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API