Long v. Landman
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent; Adsit, J. Bill by Kate E. Long against William J. Landman, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Mary C. Hurlbut, deceased, George H. Long, executor of the last will and testament of Arthur B. Long, deceased, and others, to foreclose two real-estate mortgages. From a decree for complainant, defendants, except George H. Long, appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is a proceeding to foreclose two mortgages. A decree was rendered in the court below in favor of complainant, from which decree some of the defendants appeal.
Prior to 1878, Arthur B. Long, of the State of Pennsylvania, and his son, George H. Long, had been engaged in the business of lumbering. In April, 1878, a partnership agreement was made, which, omitting the formal part, reads as follows:
“As this agreement has reference now to the late firm of A. B. Long & Son, who has formerly been doing business as the firm of A. B. Long & Son, and is now carrying on and doing business of lumbering…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farrar v. DeanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- Griffin v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Norman v. OlneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Egan v. GreceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- In re the Estate of LambieMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Porter v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Draper v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. SteelyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Houghteling v. StockbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Will of HurleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.