Warner Bros. v. Freud
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, directing the sale of the real estate of a deceased person, settling the annual account of the executrix, and directing the mortgage of real property. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hart H. North, Henry E. Monroe, and W. B. Treadwell, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appeals from an order of sale of real estate, an order settling annual account of administratrix, and an order for mortgage of real property. The several appeals will be considered in the order stated.
The deceased died seised of two lots of land, described in the petition, which he devised to his widow, Tiny Freud (now administratrix), “to hold the same during her lifetime in trust for (testator’s) five children” (named in the will, and) “upon the death of (the) wife .... to be divided among (his) said children share and share alike.” The will was admitted to probate and letters…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Toland v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Richardson v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Estate of King v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of KesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Swanberg v. National Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Agnew v. AgnewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.